post

Out in Theaters: THE LONE RANGER

“The Lone Ranger”
Directed by Gore Verbinski

Starring Armie Hammer, Johnny Depp, William Fichtner, Ruth Wilson, Helena Bonham Carter, Tom Wilkinson, James Badge Dale, Barry Pepper, Mason Cook
Action, Adventure, Western
149 Mins

PG-13

 

One of the many problems The Lone Ranger faces is that it doesn’t feel modern. The Wild West that audiences have begun to again embrace with films like True Grit and Django Unchained thrive not because of their niche western setting but because of their steadily unique voice. In a genre where everything has been done before, they divided and conquered simply by doing something audiences haven’t seen before.

In The Lone Ranger, everything feels retread, tired, and ready to boot. As a winking tribute of sorts, it works to an extent, but tonally it’s stretched like an old rubber band ready to snap. The souring riff on the noble savage, played with tone-deaf readiness by Hollywood’s favorite eccentric, Johnny Depp, is off-putting, head-scratching, mildly offensive and entirely dated. The kitschy elements of the 1930s icon could have been celebrated and preserved, even in light of a modernized overhaul, but instead director Gore Verbinski and go-to cohort Johnny Depp have gone for broke and come up with bags of sand. 

 

 
 

On a visual level, The Lone Ranger looks pretty good but it is essentially just more of the same from the House of Mouse. Instead of the seascape cinematography, Bojan Bazellis Great Plains and vast plateaus give a nice backdrop to the old west and paint a vision of the unbound expansiveness that characterized not only the landscapes but the people as well. However, his scenic vistas are often spoiled with inorganic CGI. A scene attempting to induce wonder, where a group of train passengers are privy to a stampeding herd of buffalo, looks as fake and poorly executed as the CG monkeys in Jumanji. It’s one thing to make a computer generated Kraken that only looks half believable but we’ve all seen buffalo before and they don’t look like that. It’s missteps like these that take us right out of the moment and exact attention on the anecdotal mildew eating away at the scenes.

After Jack White backed out from his anticipated rendition on an original score here, maestro Hans Zimmer steps in to do his own little ditty on old timey westerns that is largely out of his comfort zone. Particularly in the opening act, his musical choices seem strangely dour and simple in uncalled for places but a late stage rendition of the Gioachino Rossini old time classic “William Tell Overture” gives the finale a sense of unrestrained joy largely lacking throughout.

As a sandblasted counterpart to Pirates of the Caribbean, The Lone Ranger capitalizes on the same whimsical sense of adventure that characterized that blockbuster hit. While Verbinski’s gilded and sterile touch is noticeable throughout, missing is the sense of wonder and gleeful spectacle that made the original Pirates film such an unexpected hit.

Gone are the pirate ships swirling at sea and the over-the-top mannerisms of Captain Jack Sparrow and in their place are trains swirling on their tracks and the over-the-top mannerisms of Tonto. Instead of a drunken pirate slurring through his lines whilst whimsically walking the plank, Depp is sporting an antiquated dialect hardly short of full-blown racism and yet he preserves his signature teeter-totter shambling and the kooky gestures that he thinks serve as ample substitutes for character development in his recent career.

Depp’s Tonto may be a passive attempt at a revisionist facelift but the update isn’t working. Firstly and lastly, it is simply impossible to get past the fact that Depp is a white man (a well-known white man at that) playing dress-up as a Native American and masquerading as if his work here is earnest. Even his baseless makeup job is a caricature of savagery and otherness and in one fell swoop alienates his character’s underlying humanity while hammering in a false cultural cornerstone. Even his name Tonto translates to “stupid person” in Spanish.

 
 

The performance and costumery, almost helplessly seeping from Depp is disingenuous to the point of being a modern-day equivalent of black face. The trouble is you can almost tell that Depp’s heart is only half in this and he seems to be questioning the principle of his performance in the midst of it. Whoever put their stamp of approval on letting Depp play the noble savage (and yes, he is actually referred to as the noble savage) must have known they were playing with fire. Distasteful farce though it may be, this fire burns.

Armie Hammer, on the other side of the equation, seems to embrace the tongue-and-cheekiness with open arms and presents a lone ranger who is more of a shrieking Brendan Fraser-type than a hard-boiled hero. He’s a protagonist of circumstance whose biggest battle is escaping his own stilted notions of lawful sentencing in a land dictated by power-hungry manipulation and quick-draw justice. There is a fundamental disconnect between Hammer and Depp and their distinct acting sensibilities that adds up to a vacuous lack of synergy between these two leading men.

 
 
 

Hammer vies with a satirical riff on the dated concepts of wild west heroism, largely breaking expectations of the hardened western hero. His great asset is uncoordinated serendipity and he has an ethical aversion to firearms even though he is constantly in need of them. He’s gimmicky to be sure but Hammer’s self-awareness makes the experience far more pleasurable than Depp’s straight-laced quirk and Tim Burton-trained anti-spontaneity. As a man who refuses to ever watch his own work, it must be difficult for Depp to tell that the jig is up but someone needs to clue him in that the drug-addled kook he’s been playing for years must be put down Old Yeller style.

Like the characters meant to be working with each other, the film itself is fundamentally disjointed. It often feels like a piecemeal collective of set pieces strapped together with circumstantial artifices that only serve to bring our heroes into their impending action sequences. No wonder that no less than six screenwriters are responsible for this behemoth mess. Five must have been commissioned to write an action sequence each and the last must have been responsible for gluing this Humpty Dumpty back together again.

The true shame is that even with so much talent involved and a massive money-belt, the watered down result is hardly minor enjoyment even in light of some padded but fun moments. There are simply too many cooks in the kitchen and any enjoyable escapism is too little, too late. There are just too many instances of the unforgivable, mainly with Johnny Depp’s Tonto and the cringe-worthy narrative egg that encases the story, in which Tonto recounts the tale to a young boy at the fair, to give this one a pass. The Jerry Bruckheimer age of disposable Disney cinema has again balked on its chance for transcendence and has instead delivered derivation at its most sanitary.

D

post

Weekly Review 27: JESSE AND CELESTE FOREVER, FAST FIVE, MAMA, UPSTREAM COLOR, OZ: THE GREAT AND POWERFUL, THE LAST EXORCISM: PART 2


It’s been a long, long time since the last edition of Weekly Review so this installment should realistically read more like Monthly Review butlet’s just pretend together here. Aside from some at home viewing that included getting through the first season of BBC’s Luther, which I’ve really begun to enjoy, some easily digestible watching with Gordon Ramsey’s Kitchen Nightmares, yet another watch of one of last year’s greatest films, and one of the best horror movies of all time, Cabin in the Woods, I made it to theaters to see screenings of The Heat and The Lone Ranger.

In light of the fact that I have been stockpiling these ones and have about six to cover, each will be a little shorter than usual but I’ll still try to communicate the gist of my feelings on the matter.

Jesse and Celeste Forever (2012)

A rom-com with a throbbing indie heart, this brainchild written by and starring the lovely Rashida Jones is an earnest if minor delight. Lonely Island and SNL funnyman Andy Samberg plays opposite Jones as her ex-husband slash best friend and their oddly close relationship makes people around them a little bit uncomfortable. Even though they are in the throes of a separation, these people are kindred spirits deeply in love with each other even though they know they just do not work as a couple.

The most substantial achievements in the film are rooted in the charming chemistry and clever interplay between Jones and Samberg. They bounce off of each other with a natural courtship that feels like years in the making that elevates this indie fare into a territory of earnest believability not often achieved. While it isn’t game-changing cinema, it’s indie fare at its strongest and is an easy recommendation for anyone, particularly a couple, looking for something funny, pleasant and charming.

B-

Fast Five (2011)

 

After hearing how piping hot the revitalized Fast and Furious franchise was, I felt compelled to see what all the hype was actually about. While Fast Five wasn’t quite the revelatory spectacle-driven blockbuster I half-expected, it was the irresistible equivalent of lemonade on a hot summer day: simple and spot-hitting. Even though it’s hard to look past the wooden acting, pitiable character development and contrived plot elements, it was exactly the type of high-octane mindless summer flick you need every once in a while.

With the emotional complexity of Transformers (note that the cars here don’t actually transform though), Fast Five does greatly benefit from the physical presence of the Rock, Dwayne Johnson.  The stony-faced Vin Diesel is as dull as ever but director Justin Lin focuses more on the open ensemble so that we’re not stuck alone with Diesel for too much time. Even as an effects piece, Lin’s film is passable but hardly raises the bar for set piece action. Although I’m intrigued to see how long the legs are on this seemingly unstoppable franchise, don’t count me amongst the mindless drones rushing out to blog about F8st & Furi8us.

C

Mama (2013)

From the auspicious roots of his Spanish short film, Andrés Muschiettis Mama is a film stilted by its Hollywood notions of dread. Missing are the practical effects that characterized the short and in its place are unconvincing computer generated images that rob us of the looming sense of dread that Muschietti is trying to foster.

With a solid cast that includes Academy Award nominated actress Jessica Chastain and Game of Thrones alum, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Mama squanders its talent with a mostly lame-duck script and the self-defeating decision to show too much too soon. Although the actual fright-inducing scares are mostly lacking, taking the backseat to forced jump scares, there is eeriness to the relationships at play. This Guillermo del Toro production does succeed in the atypical treatment of the two young girls abandoned and raised in the woods and their resulting psyches but it doesn’t take it to the level of psychological horror hinted at. Ultimately, even though the acting is better than most within the genre, there just aren’t enough scares and the evil ghost mama at the center is hardly frightening enough to maintain a full-length feature.

C-

Upstream Color (2013)

Shane Carruth‘s follow-up to the head-scratching Primer is a bold step towards wild originality and feverish auteurship. Mostly devoid of dialogue, Upstream Color is a cyclical tone poem that favors moody introspection to outright explanation. In fact, everything is so blanketed with metaphor that it’s essentially impossible to take anything concrete away from it. In many ways, that is what makes it an interesting and challenging experience. This is not the cinema you’ve become acclimated to as the closest thing to its fiercely originality is the more abstract work of Terrence Malick. But what prevails here is a sense of completeness that often alludes the meandering Malick.

In a brief synopsis, Upstream Color follows the journey of a woman who is placed under some drug-induced spell. As she attempts to reclaim her life in the aftermath, she meets a man who may just have undergone the same traumatic thing. Even though that sounds like a somewhat straightforward analysis of the film, it is far more open-ended, contemplative and thought provoking than a brief one-off could provide. While many will probably be frustrated and bored by this shamelessly avante garde style of filmmaking, it represents a step in a bold new direction that is almost universally shied away from.

B

Oz: The Great and Powerful (2013)

 

In the opening black-and-white moments of Oz, I thought to myself, “I don’t know what people were talking about, this is enjoyably tongue-in-cheek Raimi.” Smugly, I assumed that people were just unfamiliar with the idiosyncrasies of one of Hollywood’s most marketable and yet occult filmmakers. A mere ten minutes later, in the thick of the over-saturated trees of Oz, a facepalming was the only suitable response.

Oz: The Great and Powerful is so tone-deaf to its own childish tone that any play towards seriousness comes across like a knee-slapper for a quadriplegic. It is often shockingly bad and James Franco‘s self-satisfied Oz has the charisma of a stoned lion and the draw of his bombed-out Oscar hosting. His cringe-worthy smirks make you forget about the Franco you love, shifting gears into his being one of the most obnoxious performers in Hollywood. From the god-awful CGI landscapes to the detestable cast of characters completely lacking in any degree of rational or intelligent development, Oz represents the worst of the worst of blockbuster entertainment geared towards children. It’s a wonder that parents didn’t run screaming from the theaters.

D-

The Last Exorcism: Part 2 (2013)

To have gone from such a powerful, creepy first installment to this stick in the mud is almost unexplainable. Nonetheless, this is one of the least inspired, mindless examples of disposable horror cinema I can think of. Dropping the recovered footage framework, director Ed Gass-Donnelly has gone for a more conventional approach that catches up with Ashley Bell‘s Nell after the events of the previous film. She’s attempting to live out a normal life but people just keep creeping on her. For some inexplicable reason, the film takes her struggling to come to terms with life after the fact as the focal point of the feature and we feel like we’re watching an episode of WB television written by a blind monkey.

The Last Exorcism: Part 2 is nigh unwatchable and aside from being one of the most boring film experiences I can recount, it is shockingly poorly acted. Poor Bell reacts to things before they even happen and the cast surrounding her think that opening their eyes really big is a sign of thespian skill. Le sigh. The real shame is that The Last Exorcism came out of nowhere as a genuinely frightful event that deserved some due credibility within the horror community. This film however is like the ugly cousin that tags along, burns down the house and is responsible for all your friends going to jail. It’s hard to be cool after that.

F

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

 

First Look at Darren Aronofsky's NOAH

Darren Aronofsky‘s Noah has been a long time coming and moved to the forefront of his impending projects after abandoning The Wolverine, effectively dooming it to inevitable mediocrity. But don’t expect this Biblical tale to be a preachy fantasy as Aronofsky’s indelibly dark touch will be sure to make this a dark thematic exploration of survivor’s guilt.

Noah is also expected to take a substantial philosophical stance on environmentalism, as Aronofsky claimed:

“I think it’s really timely because it’s about environmental apocalypse which is the biggest theme, for me, right now for what’s going on on this planet. So I think it’s got these big, big themes that connect with us. Noah was the first environmentalist. He’s a really interesting character. Hopefully they’ll let me make it.”

 This first pictures won’t quite blow your mind but they give you a better look at the characters at play in this bible epic as well as the stand out cast that will be playing them. Russel Crowe will fill the sandals of the the eponymous Noah, Emma Watson is daughter, Ila, Logan Lerman is son, Ham, Jennifer Connelly is Noah’s wife Naameh, Anthony Hopkins is Noah’s father, Methuselah and Ray Winstone is the yet unnamed villain. Check them all out below.

Russel Crowe as Noah
Anthony Hopkins as Methuselah
Emma Watson as Ila
Jennifer Connelly as Naameh
Logan Lerman as Ham
Ray Winstone as the big bad wolf.

Noah is directed by Darren Aronofsky and stars Russell Crowe, Jennifer Connelly, Emma Watson, Logan Lerman, Anthony Hopkins, Ray Winstone, Kevin Durand, Douglas Booth and Dakota Goyo. It storms into theaters March 28, 2014.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Out in Theaters: THE HEAT

“The Heat”
Directed by Paul Feig
Starring Melissa McCarthy, Sandra Bullock, Demián Bichir, Marlon Wayans, Michael Rapaport, Thomas F. Wilson, Tony Hale, Kaitlin Olson
Action, Comedy, Crime
117 Mins
R

 

After working on television series such as The Office, Weeds and Bored to Death, director Paul Feig emerged as a voice for a very particular brand of female comedy with Bridesmaids that has extended somewhat over into The Heat, but the ruse is up. Attempting to subvert status quo, Feig has executed a whitewash rebranding of the female comedy, collapsing gender norms and racial stereotypes into a generic mass so indistinct and overextending that it’ll be a miracle if he hasn’t set back the female comedy 20 years. While there are genuine moments of laugh-out-loud comedy to be had throughout, the female buddy cop angle is overdone and coated in a saccharine glaze. Top that off with a ceaseless dose of broad and overbearing comedy, a total of exactly 190 useless f-bombs and “action” situations so fantastical that the sense of stakes melts in your mouth like a filet mignon and you have a film just beating you over the head with a dead fish to the point of surrender.

 
When asked in a New York press conference whether this film was a sort of unofficial sequel to Miss Congeniality, Sandra Bullock promptly stated, “Hell no. The only similarities is that there’s a gun.” I’m sorry to correct you Ms. Bullock, but the similarities do not end there. First off, both characters are FBI agents struggling to fit in in order to bag the big baddie, characters who need to have their looks altered in some way in order to do accomplish their ultimate goal. To me, that is a very specific breed of film – one that sucks. To her credit, there are two big differences: Melissa McCarthy and a hard-R rating.

 

Backtracking to the beginning of the story, we meet special agent Sarah Ashburn (Bullock) on a bust. She’s the leader of an FBI task force and despite her glimmering track record, she commands no respect from the troops at her disposal. Whether this general disregard stems from her being a woman or because she’s a showboating, social pariah is unclear but it seems as if there is supposed to be an air of injustice behind the lack of obedience headed her way. Either way, her character is as obnoxious as she is uptight from the get-go and the 117-minute endurance test begins.

After learning that her immediate superior (Demián Bichir) is getting bumped up, leaving a coveted upper management position within the FBI, Ashburn is told that despite of her golden girl portfolio, she is most likely going to be passed up for the promotion because, well, no one likes her. And so begins her mission to “fit in” and become a passably tolerable human being as she investigates a big profile drug case in Boston.

Over in Beantown, the top dog cop is McCarthy’s Mullins; an air sucking, f-bomb spitting mess of a woman cloaked in dirty rags and working the streets. Our first vulgarity-overboard encounter with Mullins is revealing with respect to her character. Mullins is scoping out a local prostitute ring when she spots a John just waiting to be shaken down. Tony Hale (or, as you know him, Buster from Arrested Development) only gets a minute or two on screen as The John but in that quick glimpse offers up more laughs than his starring counterpart McCarthy.

After a brief encounter where Ashburn “steals” Mullins parking spot and Mullins is forced to inchworm crawl through a series of open windows (which is supposed to be funny because she’s fat!), we see the rivals-to-friends formula laid out with the simplicity of a doghouse blueprint. But still, none of the jokes are landing.

It feels impossible to point a finger in one direction or the other about the largely laugh-free nature of the first chunk of the beast as this is no cut and dry case of the script failing the actors or the actors failing the script, it’s just a combination of bad choices. The comedy at play is simply overbearing and scattershot and the performances backing it up are, for the most part, nothing short of obnoxious. McCarthy, in particular, sprays jokes like a drunken machine gun operator or a blind boxer taking swings in the dark and only hits the target ten percent of the time. Having said that, when the jokes do finally land, they muster some much needed laughs.

From the fiery conscious streaming from McCarthy’s unbound persona comes mile-a-minute vulgarity, off-the-wall asides and some genuinely funny commentary. Even Bullock managed to pull off a nice little zinger of a “tongue and cheek” pun but this is largely McCarthy’s show. Her biggest problem is she just doesn’t know when to stop.

Cursing strictly for the sake of cursing is not clever comedy nor is it funny and it actually stands in the way of McCarthy’s more witty moments. I’m still amongst those absolutely dumbfounded by McCarthy’s Best Supporting Actress nomination for her role in Bridesmaids but I do think that she has the potential to be a rather funny leading lady. That being said, she’s standing in her own way. You shouldn’t have to dig through a barrel of misfires to find the jokes that work. You mine the gold and toss the rest. Surely this could be a problem siphoned off into the editing room barrel but McCarthy needs to know her limits. Her unhindered crassness and vulgarity are training wheels. Comic timing may be in her favor but the side effects certainly include a headache. Using McCarthy like a fire hose to put out a brush fire, Feig has squandered the comic potential of The Heat.

Even though the end result isn’t quite the lemon that the first act suggested, there is just far too much in the black to mark this off as a success or anything worthy of suggesting to a friend. There are just too many instances of plain dumb writing that offend our presumably intelligent sensibilities. Perhaps the most egregious example is when Ashburn shows Mullins a file for a moment and then when Mullins asks to see it again, Ashburn informs her that she doesn’t have clearance. Why is she showing her the file and then saying she doesn’t have clearance? It just doesn’t make sense. Unfortunately, it’s not the only blaring plot hole in a film so torn apart that it resembles a shot up Compton corner shop.

In the noxious and obligatorily ‘We’re best friends now!” scene, Bullock stands up for McCarthy in front of the other officers and says she’s the best damn cop around. At this point, I guess we’re expected to forget that McCarthy literally hit a black guy with her car for smoking marijuana and then threw a watermelon at him and said, and I quote, “Don’t you make me feed this to you.” If this is the standard, nay the apex, of the Boston PD, I won’t be returning to Boston anytime soon.

By far, the film’s largest problem is that when it’s not funny, it’s annoying. It’s like watching a game made up solely of Hail Mary’s that shows no sign of restraint or cleverness in its tireless slog to the goal line. Between the gross-out-gags, screaming, swearing, shoving and whining, The Heat is a big baby swaddled up in it’s own thick, stinky layer of emotional cheese. Had Feig cut down about 40 or more minutes in the editing room, he actually may have transformed this into something with more energy and axed most of the DOA jokes but, the way it is, this lifeless piece bobs and sinks.

D+

post

Tell Me if This Trailer For PRINCE AVALANCHE Appeals to You

 

It was hard for me not to feel duped when I walked into Prince Avalanche expecting an indie comedy with dramatic undertones and walked out feeling like I’d just wasted two hours of my life on a steamy, bloated, self-masturbatory, art fart with absolutely no semblance of structure, pace or character investment.

I’m a fan of Paul Rudd,and Emile Hirsch is alright sometimes, and I definitely had some stoney laughs with Pineapple Express so I expected the colloboration between Rudd, Hirsch and director David Gordon Green to result in some sweet, sweet laughter and maybe even some deeper thematic elements only allowed to be touched upon in the steeple of indie fare. But not even Gordon Green’s superdud Your Highness could have prepared me for the laughless, pretentious crap that was Prince Avalanche.

It’s the movie equivalent of enduring someone who has zero respect for you, babbling on in your face about something you entirely don’t care about for two whole hours. No-one goes anywhere, nothing happens and I sat envious of the storm of patrons emptying out of the theater. This film a battle where I wanted to wave the white flag and retreat myself but stuck it out, waiting for something to save it from itself… 

So, I’m not officially supposed to review the film yet so I’ll halt my incriminating words there and let you be the judge. Watch and learn.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewpjHDZzT7A

Does this trailer make you want to see the film and what do you think that it’s preparing you for exactly? In other words, from what you’ve just seen, what would you expect from Prince Avalanche? Don’t expect my review for another month or so but assume that it’s gonna get ugly.

Prince Avalanche is directed by David Gordon Green and stars Emile Hirsch and Paul Rudd. Don’t see it, but it comes out August 9.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Lots and Lots of Beer in Trailer For DRINKING BUDDIES

http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/drinking-buddies2.jpg
Drinking Buddies
is an all around interesting piece partially because director Joe Swanberg didn’t really have a script and just let his actors riff off each other to intriguing result and partially because of the lively chemistry between the affable cast that includes Olivia Wilde, Jake Johnson, John Livingstone and Anna Kendrick. Everything feels a little awkward as your typical glamorized falling in love tale is checked at the gate.

I caught this at SIFF and attended a Q&A with Swanberg and would certainly recommend the film. Take a look at the trailer and see what you think.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxuxkQF7Bak

Drinking Buddies is directed by Joe Swanberg and stars Olivia Wilde, Jake Johnson, John Livingstone and Anna Kendrick. It hits theaters on August 23.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Ridley Scott+Cormac McCarthy+Fassbender, Pitt, Diaz, Cruz and Bardem+A Cheetah=THE COUNSELOR Trailer

http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Counselor-cheeta.jpg
What a combination we’ve got on our hands with Ridley Scott (director of Gladiator and Alien) behind the directorial horse of a Cormac McCarthy (No Country for Old Men, The Road) script with Brad Pitt, Michael Fassbender, Cameron Diaz, Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem acting it up in front of the camera.

The Counselor follows a lawyer (Fassbender) in over his head who resorts to a little bit of minor drug trafficking who soon finds out that there is no such thing as minor drug trafficking. With past McCarthy adaptations, films such as No Country for Old Men, The Road and All the Pretty Horses were adapted from his prior novels whereas this story’s genesis was always intended solely for the screen and will not have a novel counterpart.

As a big fan of Scott’s hand, McCarthy’s prosaic prowess and the acting ability of all involved, Cameron Diaz included (who is actually an early frontrunner for Best Supporting Actress), I think it’s fair to go into this one with high expectations. Although the trailer isn’t very revealing in terms of plot, the sun scorched cinematography, high tension violence (pun intended) and Bardem’s hairdo all have me sold.

Take a look at it yourself and see if you’ll be lining up for this one like I’ll be.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FX1bn1U-SY

The Counselor is directed by Ridley Scott, written by Cormac McCartney and stars Brad Pitt, Michael Fassbender, Cameron Diaz, Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem. It hits theaters October 25.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Ashton Kutcher is Steve Jobs in JOBS Trailer

 

Not to be confused with the intriguing biopic about Apple man Steve Jobs from Academy Award-winning Aaron Sorkin, a film set to play out in a mere three scenes that is currently sitting without an official title, Jobs, starring Ashton Kusher, appears at first glance to be a more soft-boiled effort. After its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, people were hardly swooning over the combination of That 70’s Show star Kusher and a nobody director.

Response has been generally unfavorable and it’s been knocked mostly for being blasé and unoriginal- the thing that Steve Jobs himself fought against more than anything. Have a look at the trailer and see if you think that this one is for you or if you’ll just be waiting for the inevitable Oscar bait penned by Sorkin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nryTz9iBqEI

jOBS is directed by Joshua Michael Stern and stars Ashton Kutcher, Dermot Mulroney, Amanda Crew, James Woods, Josh Gad, Matthew Modine, Luke Haas, J.K. Simmon and Ron Eldard. It opens wide on August 16.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SIFF Review: A HIJACKING

“A Hijacking” (Kapringen)
Directed by Tobias Lindholm 
Starring  Pilou Asbæk, Søren Malling, Dar Salim, Roland Møller, Gary Skjoldmose Porter, Abdihakin Asgar, Amalie Ihle Alstrup
Drama, Thriller 
99 Mins 
R
 
 
Tracking a fictional hijacking situation at sea, Tobias Lindholm‘s film values process over progress, where the “heroes” and “villains” play a politicking game of chess in which each seemingly trivial move is an irretractable act of positioning. If you’re fascinated by a moody, slow-moving game of “guess the number” then A Hijacking will have you hooked but if you’re looking for a bit of excitement and flourish in your thriller, you may quickly find your senses dulled by the vacillating nature of Lindholm’s tepid narrative structure. 
 
When Danish cargo ship MV Rozen is taken by Somalian pirates, a battle of compromise begins. Our first point of connection in the film is Mikkel (Pilou Asbæk) who becomes somewhat of a protagonist even though he never quite feels like the focal point. Mikkel is the vessel’s cook and is just ending a long run at sea to return home to his wife and kids. He’s an everyman who serves as a suitable blank slate to draw a sweaty transformation upon. In the midst of the stuffy, traumatic quagmire to come, Mikkel is doomed to change.
 
Before the takedown of Mikkel and crew, we switch to a few company heads navigating a trade agreement when they learn the news that their vessel, crew and cargo have been taken hostage. Instead of witnessing what is sure to have been a moment of panic, excitement, and cinema onboard the ship, we, like the company men, learn the news as it’s phoned in. Breaking expectations like this (we as an audience assume that we will see the take-down, not just hear about it later) sets the mood for what is to come.
 
 
 
Peter (Søren Malling), the man running the company, turns to a professional hijacking adviser who’s first bit of advice is to step away from the negotiations to come, as he wouldn’t want his existing relationship with the hostages to make matters personal and invite a misstep. Instead, this process needs to be calculated, cool, and entirely composed. Against his advice, Peter insists that he can be impersonal. Regrettably, Lindholm seems to have taken the same approach.
 
While we’re given glimpses of the diminishing human spirit within these passengers, our rather brief encounters with them are limited to long-drawn moments of silence. As they stagnate in captivity, we feel the same claustrophobia closing in. Rather than diving into the lost solace of these characters teetering on the breaking point, we’re stuck playing a numbers game.
 
As days turn to weeks turn then to months, the crew languishes in the throes of stand-still negotiation. Although Peter back home is taking every necessary precaution to get his crew back home safely, the process is so drawn out that it makes you wonder what he actually thinks he’ll actually be getting back at all. At what point does life lose its meaning in captivity?
 
Although the ransom of these captives is staggeringly high (with an asking price that starts north of 15 million dollars), it does raise interesting questions on the inherent value of life. With each day that goes by, these hijacked lives diminish in value, perhaps not to their employer, but to themselves. 
 
 
The narrative makes me think of Warren FellowsThe Damage Done, an autobiographical tale in which the author is jailed in Thailand for 12 years after he’s nabbed drug smuggling. Without intending to spoil anything, the thesis of that piece is that something is lost in captivity. Some important semblance of what is means to be human can literally be stolen from you as you fester in your own filth.  While Lindholm doesn’t dive full on into the question, he doesn’t dodge it either and builds a cynical sense of dread as we, the audience, await the fate of the crew. 
 
Where the film takes missteps is largely in the editing room. A stalling sense of cut-and-dry crispiness leaves the proceedings feel more clinical than emotional, making this more of a how-to-for-dummies guide to hostage situations. On the acting page, everything is serviceable but there’s nothing particularly worthy of mentioning. The cinematography, on the other hand, elicits a looming feel for apprehension. Whether we’re deep within the vacuous belly of the ship or in the overbearingly florescent office, it’s hard to feel good.
 
Noteworthy is Lindholm’s thick-skinned plodding throughout the film and his largely unemotional stance but he tries too hard for unconventionality that he tires his film out well before it’s through. Apparently he doesn’t realize that it’s possible to drop the pomp and circumstance without being pompous. Doubtlessly, the philosophical questions hinted at throughout the film are far more interesting than the back-and-forth negotiations and had potential to leave a lingering statement about intangible loss that occurs in captivity. But Lindholm largely stepped away from that chance. Had he managed to just make the whole thing a bit more exciting and emotional throughout, he would have had a real number on his hands rather than an interesting platform topped off with a humdrum glaze.

 C-

post

Robert Downey Jr. Signs for AVENGERS 2 & 3

 

After a little kerfuffle about whether Robert Downey Jr. would walk away from the hugely popular Marvel after his five picture contract expired with Iron Man 3, he has signed on to do at least two more films in the franchise with the not yet titled Avengers 2 and Avengers 3. Word is that RDJ wants to have more time on his plate to do other projects so it’s still unclear whether he will be returning for Iron Man 4. The fact that this new contract does not stipulate a fourth film in the record-setting franchise, however, is evidence enough that there probably will not be another Iron Man stand alone film…at least with Downey Jr.

Even Joss Whedon, the director of The Avengers, stated that he wouldn’t be interested in being part of the follow-up without RDJ’s presence. RDJ got onboard with Marvel early on, and has been a part of more of the franchise’s films than anyone else, so his contract was not the 9-picture deal that has become the standard bearer for newcomers to the Marvel universe such as Chris Hemsworth, who plays Thor, and Chris Evans,who plays Captain America.  

With the staggering success of Iron Man 3 and The Avengers, it’s still unclear how much draw Thor and Cap have independent of their superhero collective but we shall see when Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Soldier open in November and April 2014, respectively.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter