post

Out in Theaters: THE HOBBIT: AN UNEXPECTED JOURNEY

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey”
Directed by Peter Jackson
Starring Martin Freeman, Ian McKellan, Richard Armitage, Elijah Wood, Ian Holm, Hugo Weaving, Cate Blanchett, Christopher Lee, Andy Serkis
Adventure, Fantasy
169 Mins
PG-13

With The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey, director Peter Jackson has bitten off more than he can chew. Jackson has to reinvest his audience with a new and somewhat minor quest while introducing an entirely novel and risky technological advancement, a task that he ultimately fails.

The Hobbit details the journey of hobbit Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen) and a company of dwarves led by warrior prince Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage) as they embark towards the conquered dwarf palace carved into the Misty Mountainsto reclaim a vast treasure stolen by the malevolent dragon, Smaug. The travelers encounter one misplaced affair after another and between the orcs, wargs, mountain trolls, storm giants, goblins, a mysterious necromancer and disapproving elves, the tale feels overstuffed and a little inorganic.

With so much going on, it sometimes becomes languid and monotonous but the visual effects, character and set design, and lavish costumes create a stunning backdrop for the tale to unfold which is even more pronounced when seen in high-frame rate 3D.

The advent of high frame rate — 48 frames per second (FPS) — technology came on the heels of complaints that 3D films shot at the industry standard (24 FPS) are shutter strobed when the camera is panning, particularly during action sequences. But do the consequences of higher frame rates outweigh the positives?

The answer is… kind of. 48 FPS presents a hyperrealism that makes camera adjustments completely unnoticeable but is distracting to the inaugural eye and, at times, uncomfortably jarring.
In scenes where characters are talking, or more notably, writing, their gestures seem unnaturally accelerated and physically inconsistent. At best, this goes unnoticed and at its worst, looks like a hi-def home video shoot.

During the action sequences though, it works brilliantly. Every blade swing is crystal clear, every slain goblin sprawling from a cliff is beautifully articulated and the sweeping camera movements create sequences that seem painterly in their scope and motion.

People typically resist tech advancement at first, from the use of commercial airplanes to iTunes updates, so it’s hard to say what the real value of this technology is. Is a commercial and critical backlash symptomatic of a natural resistance to the new or is this a more definitive rejection?

One thing is clear, it’s going to take some adjustment for the uninitiated to accept high frame rate films, a process that isn’t going to happen overnight.

But technology is not the only thing on display here and unfortunately the story can be, at turns, equally lackluster and divisive.

Whereas The Lord of the Rings was surprising touching, its emotional resonance is almost entirely absent here. The bond of the original fellowship rendered the trilogy a record-breaking 11 Oscar wins (The Return of the King) but there is little earned about the relationships in this prequel.

The hefty troop of dwarves are more caricatures than fleshed-out people and the return of Gandalf, played by McKellen, is disappointingly amiss. The inimitable light has gone from his eyes as it has from the series itself.

While a handful of cameos from familiar faces may stir nostalgia for the original triad, it rarely serves the film effectively. An introductory scene that features a glimpse of a virginal Frodo is fine but entirely unnecessary to the plot of this tale. Freeman (Sherlock) however is perfectly cast as Bilbo and remains the most promising aspect of this film’s journey.

The standout of the film though is the glorious return of Gollum, played with wit and panache by series regular Andy Serkis (The Lord of the Rings, Rise of the Planet of the Apes). While Bilbo may be stealing Gollum’s precious ring, Serkis is stealing the scene.

While nothing here is egregious, The Hobbit fails to live up to the massive heights of one of the greatest film trilogies of all time. Although it’s better than your average blockbuster both in terms of its visual razzle-dazzle and plotting, it isn’t destined to join the ranks of unforgettable classics.

The end product is a loose hodgepodge of scenes, many of which could have been left for the blu-ray extended editions. Had Jackson focused more on storytelling and thoughtful character development, The Hobbit would have become a much tighter and purposeful film.

C

Out in Theaters: CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE FIRST AVENGER

Captain America: The First Avenger is a vintage superhero flick set in the Golden American age but with enough modern special effects and Nazi baddies to make it a load of fun. From the get go, we know that Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) embodies the American spirit, although his 90 pound shrimp-like body and short stature hardly make him a perfect candidate for the war effort. Even after multiple rejections, Rogers continues to try to enlist until his endless determination and little patriotic soul catches the attention of scientist Dr. Abraham Erskine (an amusing Stanley Tucci) who deems him the best candidate for his super soldier experiment. In a literal human transformation, Rogers gains a quick hundred pounds of muscle, six inches in height, the ability to spirit as fast as a car and jump like a squirrel, speedily earning the title Captain America.

Unlike some of Marvels other attempts, Captain America is given a world all of his own, a retro world where America is a sterling symbol, something to take pride in, to fight and to die for. While the tone of the film is very happy go lucky, its clear that Evans doesn’t see Cap as a joke. He’s a deeply motivated man who beneath his jests and silly suit is just a really great guy.

Since most of the film takes place in the 1940’s, it’s no great surprise when a scene is suddenly interrupted by spontaneous hooky dance numbers or punctuated by pro-Americana speeches to invest in war bonds. Nor is the posturing of a rogue Nazi villain and his nearly space-aged weapons technology obnoxious. If anything the overlap of advanced technology with typical 1940’s weaponry is an interesting and entertaining, juxtaposition. And yes, there may be more than one shot of Captain American slo-mo jumping away from an explosion, but it’s fun regardless. And while these parts are obviously silly, they don’t inspire disdain or make us want to scoff at them. Captain America: The First Avenger is aware of its Golden Age roots and inherent foolishness but instead of mocking them, it asks us to root for them.

While the stoic Captain America may seem like a relic at times, his pathologically heroic personality is actually what gives this character so much punch. He does have these old fashion ideals that provoke him to lay his life on the line for what he believes, but it never feels cheap. Even more so than other Marvel characters, Captain America could have easily been a lazy mock-up but Evans choose to play him like a real person with depth and feelings and that is what gives the movie life.

Another bonus to the film is the gorgeous Hayley Atwell as Cap’s love interest, Peggy Carter. Atwell and Evans have a very natural chemistry, as well as a nicely scripted relationship that seems more essential to the character’s story than incidental (see Thor). The supporting cast, for the most part, is equally entertaining. Tommy Lee Jones’ does his superiority-complexed, furrowed brow Tommy Lee Jones thing; Hugo Weaving as the Red Skull, especially when he’s in human-faced form, plays a fine maniacal villain bent on world domination; and Stanley Tucci steals the show as well placed comic relief.

At the best of times, the film is reminiscent of Raiders of the Lost Arc but with a looser story and better effects (speaking of effects, I’m still quite impressed with the scrawny version of Evans. I’m still baffled with how they made him so small.) At worst of times, it feels shoddy and poorly edited, especially in its jigsaw puzzle-esque second act. It allows itself to get a little off track and feels like it wasn’t nearly as focused as it should be, instead offering completely random tidbits of shoot ’em up action.

While some may tire of superhero origin tales, Captain America’s origin makes for a perfect first act; setting up the pathos of the character and his strong motivations. It’s endearing fun with just enough heart and drama to captivate an audience. It’s the last step before The Avengers and does a great job of putting the final pieces in place while getting us all really stoked for what’s next. Although it’s not nearly a perfect film, all in all, Captain America is just a lot of fun.

B

Out in Theaters: THOR

The latest in Marvel superhero movies, Thor is a surprisingly fresh take on the superhero movie. Our main hero, the god of thunder Thor, is an inherently silly character. He wields a giant magical hammer that has a name, wears a silly giant red cap, a thick plate of armor and sports a blond lion’s mane as hair.

If Kenneth Branagh, the director famous for directing/starring in Shakespearean films, has decided to approach the film seriously, it would have been really problematic. Thankfully, there is a degree of self-awareness, an element of taking this silliness, pointing it out and then just having fun with it. Since he is very aware of all the silliness at the heart of the Thor mythos, Branagh is able to use such to make the film comedic and fun, breezy and enjoyable, which has lead a lot of people to draw comparison between it and Iron Man.

Not knowing much of Thor’s mythology, I was impressed with the scope of the film, having hardly expected so much of it to take place in a fantasy realm. This made it feel more like a fantasy or sci-fi than a standard superhero movie and that was a welcome change; a nice change up to the standard fare. That is not to say that those fantastical parts weren’t super cheesy at times; the larger than life sets, the awesomely overdone costumes, evil Frost Giants…; but it was nice to see something entirely new. Chris Hemsworth was definitely a good choice as the titular character. He manages to be arrogant without being annoying, pulling off a hero who is both undoubtedly sure of himself but is fun to watch.

More importantly, we actually care about this character, we want him to succeed and this is largely due to Hemsworth’s performance. I mean how often does a superhero cry? And while many are saying that Thor little more than another piece to The Avenger’s puzzle, more than anything, I’m personally left wondering how they will fit these two worlds together.

Ultimately, we can thank Branagh for adding layers of complexity to a character that just seems downright difficult to translate into film, as Thor really had massive potential to simply be terrible. The high points of the movie were the constantly evolving family relationships, which admittedly got convoluted at points, and Thor’s initial inability to catch on to the mannerisms of Earth which resulted in some genuinely comedic moments. Although Thor was no great piece of art, it really was enjoyable, and a pleasant surprise. Congrats Marvel, I’m starting to become genuinely interested in The Avengers.

B