post

Amy Schumer and Judd Apatow Talk TRAINWRECK

f52a8910-b74e-47c5-a7be-0e83295b5367-2060x1236.jpg
2015 is shaping up to be the year of the great rom-com as Judd Apatow‘s Trainwreck is the third great romantic comedy or romantic comedy drama (or romantic dramedy) that I’ve seen this year – the other two being Adult Beginners and Sleeping With Other People. A portion of our SXSW review states:

Take it from the effervescently crass mouth of Amy Schumer, “The title was always Trainwreck. Trainwreck or Cum Dumpster.” Oh Amy, you are such just so…you. From talk radio appearances to gross-out Twitter posts, the Schum has crafted her image on being unapologetically, oh-so-adorably crude and in the context of Trainwreck, it’s miraculous to take in. At last night’s premiere, when an audience member inundated her with compliments, she barked, “Stop trying to fuck me.” She has swiftly become the epitome of 21st century feminism-as-middle finger; the crème de la crème of vagina jokes and reverse slut shaming that will melt the lipstick off housewives and zap the calories off your finger sandwiches with her gloriously nasty one-liners and hysterically sexual non-sequiturs. (Full review here)

Amy and Judd appeared after the SXSW premiere of what is being referred to as a “work in progress” cut of the film – though in my review, I question how much – or rather how little – change we’ll see before the final cut – to talk about where the film came from, what it was like working together, what makes Amy Schumer Amy Schumer and moving the action from LA to NYC.

———————————————————————————————————————

How was it, working with Amy on this?

Judd Apatow: I was just a fan. I heard Amy on the Howard Stern show one day. I had been talking a lot about these things, and I was just sitting in my car in the parking lot, because I didn’t want to miss it. I remember thinking, “I think she has stories to tell.” And I called her and said, “Do you want to meet?”, and she wrote back.

Amy Schumer: I said, “I’m super busy.” Yeah, I was like, “Oh my god!” We met in person, to find out what stories we’d like to tell.

What was one of the most fun parts of making this movie for you?

AS: The most fun part? This is super personal, but this is a personal story, for me. Just getting to do it with my sister there, every step of the way. Being able to play with my sister, Kim, and having her there. She helped me to write it. So getting to go back to my trailer every day, and being like, “Do I have a trailer?” This is my first movie, so getting to be with her, from day one to the last day, when we went back, and started drinking tequila, just the two of us. It was so special to do with her.

Judd most of your films take place in L.A. but this is set in NYC. What compelled you to really write a really classic New York City romance?

AS: I was born and raised in New York City and then we went bankrupt and moved to Long Island. I write everything that I’ve ever written in New York. I can’t imagine having a big kitchen. Judd was nice enough to leave his family for a couple of months and shoot in the ninety-degree New York China Town weather. I write everything in New York.

How close is the story true to real life?

AS: I’m fine! The truth is, I submitted my first script to Judd and he was really nice. He was like, “Why don’t you write about what’s really up?” And I took a look at myself. So this is very much me taking a look at what’s going on with me. I wanted to say, “This poor girl!” But yeah, it’s me.

Where do you get your attitude of empowerment from?

AS: I think I was just very innocent for a long time. I was just visiting my brother last week, in Chicago, and he reminded me that I didn’t lose my two front teeth until fifth grade. But I had just had my first period so I was just this jack o’ lantern with tits, walking around! I just looked like Pinocchio, when he was transitioning into a donkey. Or like Pluto. I just didn’t think anything was possible but polygamy for me until I was 30. So I don’t know. I get super sentimental when I see girls on the Ellen show, just like young girls that feel like everything’s okay, and for some reason, I held on to that for longer than most. I just encourage that kind of being non-apologetic and that you’re allowed to be a human being. Yeah, and I was lucky to meet people like Howard Stern and Judd.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Out in Theaters: GET HARD

Get_Hard_Movie__3_.jpg
Written and directed by Etan Coen – no, not he of the Coen Bros ilk – Get Hard left me questioning whether a mainstream comedy could deal with – and more importantly make fun of – race relationships and prison yard homosexuality without being intrinsically racist or homophobic. The answer is trickier than you might think. The liberal in me got tense around Get Hard‘s stereotypical depictions of “black people doing black people things” – hanging on stoops, twerkin’ – and “gay people doing gay people things” – the ever-delightful pairing of brunch and BJs. Read More

post

SXSW Review: DEATHGASM

Many have tried to imitate the cinematic fine art that is The Evil Dead and few have been able to ape Sam Raimi‘s splatterhead mesterpiece with as much boundless, bloody guile as Peter Jackson. Yes, the blockbusting king of Middle Earth Peter Jackson. Though most know the frumpy Kiwi from his work on the Lord of the Rings and Hobbit movies, Jackson actually began his career making low-budget, amateur horror flicks using friends and recycled cameras. The more you know. Read More

post

SXSW Review: 6 YEARS

F55192.jpg
In the throes of first love, life becomes exasperatingly disoriented. We convince ourselves that there is but one person who can appreciate, understand and care for us and that that person should not be let go lest we never experience such a sensation of belonging again. Future aspirations come to head with plans of fidelity and the person you are and the person you want to become begin to be at odds. With 6 Years, Hannah Fidell is able to poke her camera into the epicenter of a relationship at the structural crossroads of graduating from college as they differentiate the needs of the “me” versus the needs of the “us”.

From go, Mel Clark (Taissa Farmiga) gloats to friends about the idyllic nature of her and boyfriend Dan’s six-year affair. Having been together since high school (and having been neighbors even then), they know each other better than anyone else and they’ve got plans to keep it that way . According to Mel, they’ll be married with a baby at 26. Still with one more year to go before graduation, Mel seems to have her life planned out to a T, unfortunately those plans don’t hold much room for variation.

Enter Dan (Ben Rosenfield), a graduating senior with a hooked-up record label internship on the brink of becoming something more. Even after six years, Dan and Mel still have amazing sex, they still laugh and communicate openly, they still have stupid fights about nothing. Fights that blow up into physical confrontations. Confrontations that land one of the parties in the hospital on more than one occasion.

To see a film about young people that navigates the dangerous waters of domestic disputes is an all too rare thing. The borderline physically abusive nature of their relationship is depicted as delicately as such a topic ought to be, raising questions rather than passing judgment with Fidell unwilling to paint in purely blacks and whites. Rather, there’s a calm nuance to Fidell’s voice that’s often absence from that of her characters. Though she can remain cool and collected, Ben and Mel, like the young adults they are, often make rash decisions.

6-years.jpg
Because an intimate character study such as 6 Years depends so heavily on solid performances to sell the drama as the real deal, the effect and impact of the film lies squarely on the shoulders of Farmiga and Rosenfield and each handle the material with a kind of preternatural grace and convincing aplomb. When I asked them if they drew from any prior relationships to help define their roles and relationships in the film, both said no. And yet, they tackle the material with vitriol and dexterity, smoothly navigating the dramatically challenging material  and totally able to sell the more noodle-brained “teenagers in love” numbers.

Fidell keeps the sentimentality in check, able to offer a compelling though distanced look at the crumbling facade of “true love.” There are moments of 6 Years that threaten to derail the authenticity of the product but Fidell proves that she knows better than to dip her toe into the salty waters of through-and-through schmaltz. That doesn’t mean there aren’t moments where things get a little overboard.

Emotionally raw though a dash melodramatic, Hannah Fidell’s 6 Years is a bittersweet look at love and sacrifice at the ripe young age of 21. Fidell plants us at the focal point of their oft imploding relationship with truly intimate camerawork that operates in tandem with the film’s unobtrusive technical aspects – like Julian Wass‘ mellow score and Andrew Droz Palermo‘s low profile cinematography work – to create a convincing, and affecting, narrative. Able to share its time equally between the two leads – both of whom offer excellent performances – 6 Years paints an important and empathetic portrait of young relationships without necessarily taking a side. Like Boyhood and Blue is the Warmest Color before it, 6 Years enters a class of independent film that young people should be made to watch before making any major life decision.

B

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Talking with Taissa Farmiga and Ben Rosenfield of 6 YEARS

F55192.jpg

For all the schmaltzy young love that pollutes our movie screens (*cough* If I Stay, Fault in Our Stars *cough*) there comes the ocassional tale of youth and young love that actually merits a watch. 6 Years is that movie. And now that it’s been picked up by Netflix, you’ll actually probably watch it. How novel! From our review;

Emotionally raw though a dash melodramatic, Hannah Fidell’s 6 Years is a bittersweet look at love and sacrifice at the ripe young age of 21. Fidell plants us at the focal point of their oft imploding relationship with truly intimate camerawork that operates in tandem with the film’s unobtrusive technical aspects – like Julian Wass‘ mellow score and Andrew Droz Palermo‘s low profile cinematography work – to create a convincing, and affecting, narrative. Able to share its time equally between the two leads – both of whom offer excellent performances – 6 Years paints an important and empathetic portrait of young relationships without necessarily taking a side. Like Boyhood and Blue is the Warmest Color before it, 6 Years enters a class of independent film that young people should be made to watch before making any major life decision.

Speaking with 6 Years stars Taissa Farmiga and Ben Rosenfield, we discussed morphing technology, favorite flicks, American Horror Story, dream directors and getting advice from their older generation.

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————

So first of all, congratulations! Your film was just picked up this morning by Netflix!

Taissa Farmiga: Thank you.

Which is kind of crazy, because Netflix is really shifting, in the way that they’re now acquiring exclusive material. They picked up ‘Beasts Of No Nation’ as well [and also Manson Family Vacation.] So, when you guys are thinking about the future of film and what medium that film comes in, does that play a part in how you think about your roles, and what opportunities you might want to take?

Ben Rosenfield: I think it effects it – just in terms of what a movie is going to. It’s a different medium, so it broadens the scope of how things might work, you know what I mean? A film like this, I think, is going to work beautifully on Netflix, and there are other ones where it’s like, it belongs in a movie theater, properly, in that way. Netflix, and the internet, is just creating a wider variety of platforms.

It’s changing everything.

TF: It’s letting more people access it now. Which isn’t, it’s not a negative thing. Again, it’s just thinking, “Where’s the best place?” Some things belong in the movie theater.

So with this, what was it about the director, Hannah Fidell, that basically won you guys over and where you felt comfortable saying, “This is the project I need to be a part of?”

TF: When I was reading the script, I immediately fell in love with the characters – they’re so relatable, and so personal. I just thought, “I would love to play this,” because, also, I’m 20, and I’m figuring life out. I would love to portray that. So the script actually had a bunch of images in it, for visuals, for tonal references…

Oh, cool.

TF: So I got to see a little bit of Hannah’s mind, and what she envisioned the project. It was very helpful. Then I had a Skype with her and Mark Duplass, and I heard them talk about it. They just sounded so smart, and like good people, and I was like, “”I want to make a movie with them.”

They had a vision?

TF: Yes.

BR: Also, all of what Taissa is saying is similar to the experience I had, and then I also watched ‘The Teacher’ before, and I thought it was a really interesting film.

So, Taissa, how has it been for you, navigating the film world, having your older sister showing you the ropes, saying, “You should do this, and this…” I’ve gathered that you have a strong bond but do you ever feel like, “Back off! Let me do my own thing here!”

TF: No, never! I feel so blessed to have my older sister. She’s been through it all; she’s been through the ringer. If I call her up, and go, “[Vera], what do I do? I’m in this circumstance – I’ve got to pick this job, or this job.” She’s just always there for me. She’s helped guide me. I owe her so much. It’s nice to have someone to talk to, and now she’s got someone to talk to. I know how hard it is. So yeah, it’s great! It’s nice to have your own personal wealth of information, right there. I pick her brain all the time.

Taissa, you found your breakout with ‘American Horror Story’, and Ben, I know the last film you worked on was ‘A Most Violent Year’. So can you both talk about working with these exquisite talents? Like Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain as well as Kathy Bates and Jessica Lange, who’s just phenomenal in that show?

TF: Man, it’s just incredible to have not been in this industry for so long and to get to work with these incredible people. I mean, just massively talented people. I love to just sit back and watch how these people work, rather than be like, “Oh, tell me everything!” I’m more of a…

An observational learner.

TF: To see how they operate, and take what I can from that. If they want to throw a couple of tips out there, I gobble them right up.

BR: It’s amazing getting to work with great actors. You learn a tremendous amount from them. It’s like the best. Taissa didn’t go to college. I didn’t go to college. But I think we’re both getting a pretty great education, based on that.

Do you have any funny stories, where one of these actor giants has just taken you aside and tried to guide you one way or another?

TF: I stepped on Jessica Lange’s line once during ‘American Horror Story’. It was totally fine, I was just too over-eager to like show my stuff and because they switched the lines a little bit and I didn’t know what was happening. I go to go, and I see her look over at me, and I shrink.

That terrifying Jessica Lange stare.

TF: I mean, it was nothing, but you know me, of course. “Oh my God, the lion’s looking at me.”

Following up on ‘American Horror Story’, I think the show is one of the best platforms for female performances, not only in television but in movies. That kind of makes me think of a quote from Zoe Saldana, where she said something like, “Genre films – sci-fi, horror, etc. – really have the best opportunities for women to work.” They get better opportunities when they work in these genre niches. Is that an experience that you’ve had?

TF: Well, it’s interesting because, like in the horror genre, females are very empowered. Like The Final Girls, the one that wins; it’s the woman.

Especially in ‘American Horror Story’.

TF: Especially in ‘American Horror Story’. In ‘Final Girls’, as well, it was uplifting a woman, which was nice to play.

BR: I think there’s also a lot of objectification of women going on in horror films, too.

There is.

TF: That’s what’s so nice about ‘Final Girls’. It makes fun of those tropes. Like ‘The Slutty Girl’, ‘The Mean Girl’, ‘The Shy Girl’. It makes fun of that. It’s like, “That’s in the past, guys.” It brings a fresh way of doing it.

My final ‘American Horror Story’ question: I know you’ve been in, you’ve been out, you’ve been in it again, kind of oscillating back and forth, from season to season. So, if you were to follow your trend, you would be in the next season. Is that something that you’ve discussed and talked about?

TF: I’m just so busy with movie stuff lately. And I also just got another pilot, for a show called ‘L. A. Crime’, for ABC, so I’m excited for that because it shoots on the Sunset Strip. If it works out to do ‘American Horror Story’ I would love to do that show. I was there in the beginning and it meant so much to me. If I could poke my head in and say “Hi,” I would love to.

So, unfortunately, I’ve not yet seen ‘6 Years’, I was sick as a dog from food poisoning.

BR: I’m so sorry. That sucks!

That always seems to be what happens when you travel. But can you just kind of give me a bird’s eye perspective of what the film is about, and how you divorce it from previous incarnations of this young, romantic drama film? What sets it apart?

BR: To answer the first part, it’s the story of a young couple who’s been together since high school, and they’re now approaching the end of college, and their paths are starting to diverge.

They’ve been together for six years?

TF: Yeah, their relationship started in this youthful place and as they’re transitioning into adults, and they’re changing, either their relationship is changing with them, or it’s not.

BR: I think what’s different about this film is the way the split happens, the way it manifests itself. It’s told in a unique way. There’s some domestic violence which happens, which you don’t see very often with young people. I think the fact that me and Taissa are actually the ages of the people we’re playing is cool.

Rather than thirty-year-old people playing college students?

TF: That’s what’s so nice about it. It feels so real. Because we’re the real age. We’re also going through these transitions in our lives, so we can relate to these characters really well. It just feels so relatable. It’s personal. It’s intimate.

BR: And we improvised a great deal of the film.

Oh, okay.

BR: Which happens, but again, you don’t see a lot of films with young people improvving.

So did you guys draw on any particular relationship in the past that you’ve experienced in order to play this?

TF: Not specifically. Obviously, I drew on just past experiences, with people that I’ve connected to and dealt with in my life. But nothing specific.

A couple of quick shot questions that you can just do quick answers to. If there’s any director that’s working today and said, “I need you in my next film,” who’s the one you just couldn’t turn down?

BR: P. T. Anderson.

TF: Oh, that’s a good one. I’d love to work with Danny Boyle. I almost got to. I got to audition with him. He directed my hand in the audition room. To be able to do that, for a real movie.

BR: Also, Todd Rohall. I want to work with Todd Rohall. He’s a genius.

And another quick one: what was your favorite film of last year, and what really speaks to you in these kinds of movies?

BR: I guess I’ll say ‘Force Majeure’. I loved that movie. Last year was good so I’m just naming the first thing that came into my head. I loved it because it’s very, very sad and it’s very, very funny. I love art that has both sides. It’s so well done.

TF: You know what I actually loved, and you can’t bitch because you were in this? I loved ‘The Most Violent Year’. I love Oscar. I thought it was a great cast. Obviously, part of me wanted to see [Ben] in it to talk about it. I loved it – it was a little bit of a slow burn, which is not usually my taste, but I really loved it. Jessica Chastain was so subtle in it.

She’s so good! And, finally, where are you guys off to next? What’s the next big projects, and things you’re circling right now?

TF: I’ve got a couple of projects here that are about to come out, and hopefully they’ll sell. But I’m about to go shoot a pilot in L.A.

‘L. A. Crime’, that you were talking about?

TF: Yeah. So that’s cool.

Anything else on the docket for films? Going back to the TV world for a little bit?

TF: I shot a Western last year. I got to work with Warren Beatty, as well. I’m hoping those are about to come out soon. I want to get those out into the world.

BR: I’m in a play right now, so I have to leave the festival and go finish that up. In another Manhattan Class company. And then this summer, I’m in Woody Allen’s new film. And then I might go to England, and record some music. Not filming anything in particular though.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SXSW Review: HE NEVER DIED

1421036_211521212364900_1238380599_o.jpg
OG Black Flag vocalist Henry Rollins has been lending himself out to little movie roles since he left the band in 1986. Arguably his most prominent and commercial appearance came out of his run on Sons of Anarchy as the muscle of white supremacist group the League of American Nationalists. In the role, Rollins hinted at a dangerous side – ok, “hinted” is a vast understatement – whereas with He Never Died, he pairs that dangerous edge with some delightfully droll humor. The combination keep the wheels turning in this laugh out loud funny and mostly compelling midnighter.

Operating under the assumption that less is more – and here, he’s totally right to – Rollins underplays the funny bits of Jack, a kind of fallen angel type who, you guessed it, never dies. Part of the fun is figuring out who/what Jack is – he is a vampire? a demon? a brainy zombie? – so I won’t spoil the fun for the uninitiated. I will however hint towards the fact that – as is made obvious by the film’s title – he’s no mere mortal.

When we meet Jack, he’s a self-inflicted hermit living a regulated life of dropping into church bingo, eating his three meals a day at a barely average diner and exchanging caches of cash for brown paper satchels of… something. Discovering what that something is begins to make Jack take form so again, its identity will go uncovered.

Despite his best efforts to live a life of solitude, Jack finds a young girl claiming to be his daughter, Andrea (Jordan Todosey), on his doorstep one rainy afternoon, disorienting his isolationist practices with her 21st century laid back attitude and casual nosing into his personal affairs. Just as Andrea begins to tweak his routine for the better – maybe talk to diner waitress Cara (Kate Greenhouse) who’s never had anything but warm looks to offer? – Jack finds himself wrapped up in a criminal plot courtesy of the mystery satchels that he wants no absolutely part of.

1035x690-hr-1800-1386872630.jpg

Regardless of the fact that Jack has no intention of stirring up trouble, he proves an incredibly effective killer – a favorable side effect of his immorality. Up against a group of criminal scum and  assorted evildoers of the garden variety, Jack is a kind of unflinching, indestructible Bryan Mills type. He crushes his way through assemblies of armed men with his bare fists, regardless of how many bullets they plug into him. And though much more interested in getting back to the swing of normality than pursuing any kind of vengeful bloodlust, Jack will do whatever is required of him to ensure that Andre and Cara are out of harm’s way and not necessarily in a gentle manner. A fact that a corral of baddies can attest to.

As a kind of horror film noir, He Never Died cleverly thrives on the experience of watching Jack unfold. Though potentially one-dimensional, Jack benefits greatly from Rollins’ “man of few words” schtick. A goon winding up to punch Jack is told “Don’t”. After a real walloping, Jack barely flinches. “I told you not to do that,” he grumbles before snapping the man’s arm in two.

Jack’s brand of unaffected, “did you really just do that?” reactions lend the action a sense of categorical silliness. It makes for the kind of comedy you that if you know it’s not your cup of tea, you’re unlikely to react to any of the film’s budding charm. Budget constraints keep a lot of the action offscreen but when writer/director Jason Krawczyk is able to put the rumpus fights front and center, he makes sure to do so mostly in a comic manner. As far as He Never Died is concerned, this makes the proceedings gleeful and bemusing, if light on the genre’s signature bloodstained offerings.

C+

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Talking with Robert Duvall of WILD HORSES

477661193-e1400515714521.jpg

With Wild Horses, Robert Duvall returns to the director’s chair after a 13 year stay of absence. Though he attempts to craft an unlikely movie with meaning inside the confines of a thriller/western, the film gets away from him. From our review;

“The proof-of-concept for Wild Horses is in the pudding: Robert Duvall in front of and behind the camera, festival “it” boy James Franco and once teenage heart-throb Josh Hartnett saddled at his side. Even though Duvall hasn’t directed a film since 2003’s widely panned Assassin Tango (what. a. terrible. name.) there is promise in the idea of the diverse trio hidden beneath cowboy brims mugging through difficult family dynamics. Duvall, Franco and Hartnet aptly square off but there is just so much wrong with Wild Horses that it’s hard to overlook its bumbling, clueless ways.” (Full review here)

Though we touch on the film and its “terrible” roots – his words not mine – Robert opens up about the awards season, his favorite films of the last few years, foreign film, young actors, his directorial style and roles that he’s offered now that he’s well into his 80s.

 

——————————————————————————————————————————————-

Over the last decade, you’ve been somewhat choosy with your roles, and as a living film legend, you must get offers left and right?

RD: Well, some.

Not as much as you might think?

RD: Not as good.

Well still, even with what is coming down the pipeline, what in particular really attracts you to a project, or a film, or a filmmaker these days?

RD: The character, first. The character and the writing. And then the director, and then the overall script. But maybe if I can do something a little bit different with this character then I did before. Maybe. A little different. It’s always the character that is the initial impetus.

And when you’re looking at characters, are you mainly looking for someone you relate to, or do you mainly look for ways to experience something you haven’t already?

RD: Both. Yeah, just something different. Like I told people before, it really had been presented to me, and then it wasn’t. I wanted to play something related to Don Quixote. And when I did ‘Lonesome Dove’ Mark Tree was influenced by Cervantes, I had heard. Man on horseback, saving ladies, that kind of thing. Sometimes when you plan something, something else comes around the corner and surprises you that just takes over what you’re planning, so you never know what’s around the corner. This guy’s got a script for me to read – have you seen ‘Wild Tales’, by the guy Damian Szifron?

Yeah.

RD: Wow, what a film!

It was awesome.

RD: And now he has a film western, he wants to do. I owe it to him! He wants to go up and everything. But you know, I do have the rights to ‘The Days The Cowboys Quit’, the novel by Elmer Kelton, the great Texas playwright. He was one of the greatest Western writers of all time – a lot of people in Texas don’t even known him. He’s a great writer who died recently, who wrote a novel, a true story, about some cowboys who went on strike, which they never do. They don’t unionize for anything! But they want to strike, because the big ranch owners wouldn’t let them have small bands of horses and cattle. So AMC is going to do it as a two-part miniseries.

Is that something you would be directing, or starring in?

RD: Oh, no. I’m back off of it. I’ve had enough for a while. No, I would play a part, and help produce, and help attract good actors, because there are so many good actors. Young actors now are better than ever.

Who do you like, in particular?

RD: Well, the performance last year by McConaughey – Brando couldn’t have done better than that. Whether or not he’ll ever be that good again, I don’t know. His older brother is a good friend, he’s coming today – Rooster McConaughey, crazy fellow. Lot of good guys! I saw a thing the other day about Brad Pitt doing a part when he was young. People knock him, everybody criticizes him, but he was wonderful, Brad Pitt. And now Joaquin Phoenix could be good, in a certain way. There’s a lot of good actors around. To me, they’re better then ever – black actors, white, Spanish, this, that. There’s more of a chance for people to go into it. I saw this little film here, two years ago, ‘Dynamiter’, better than some of the big Hollywood pictures. They picked people off of the street to be in it – it’s very pure. So I like small films. Like ‘The Apple’, by the seventeen-year-old girl from Iran. She was seventeen years old! Anyone can pick up a camera, anywhere in the world, and do something.

Just last year you were nominated for your second Academy Award  but at this point, when you’ve done the ceremony so many times…

RD: I have been a lot.

But it’s been fifteen, sixteen years?

RD: It’s been a while.

But is that something, when you go back into it, are you kind of exhilarated, or are you kind of over it?

RD: No, it’s exciting. I want [my wife] to experience it as well – it’s great, to have her there with me. It’s fine. It was so interesting, because I was sitting there, and this guy sitting behind me, this Russian guy who did this nice film, he was practicing his victory speech. It was great, because the script won! ‘Leviathan’.

A beautiful film.

RD: It was. Very moving. Ida was my favorite movie of the whole year.

There were some fantastic foreign films last year.

RD: A good second place was ‘Wild Tales’.

‘Force Majeure’ was also excellent.

RD: That was pretty good. I saw one recently, from Denmark, a couple of weeks ago.

So, you being both an actor and a director, what are some of the added challenges for you, when you’re doing both. I know that ever since ‘Angelo My Love’, back in 1983, you’ve been starring in all of your directorial debuts.

RD: Since then. I did one other, before then.

The documentary, ‘We’re Not the Jet Set’.

RD: I was the only professional actor in that. I used Egyptian actors, not Romanian, but Egyptian nationals. I always think that being a good actor comes from being a liar, or being a truthful person. But that Egyptian is amazing! It’s still action and cut. Instead of having some guy out there saying, “What do you think?” to the director, “Okay, let’s move on.” I don’t have any of that. I’m there by myself. I kind of trust myself. I’ve done it enough that I can kind of trust my instincts. I don’t even like to look at the monitor that much.

Really? Do you just kind of go by the feel of the take?

RD: Yeah. I know when something is right. I’m superstitious. By the time you get back to the monitor, maybe it’s no good. It looks good for me!

What is it that usually throws you off? “That wasn’t the right take. Let’s do that again.”

RD: Little things. “It’s okay. Let’s try it again.” When myself, or the other people are going too much offhand. Even the big, emotional scenes in life, sometimes, you do things. There’s always something offhand. Let the process take you to the result. I worked with a director once, an old-school, who said “When I say ‘Action’, you tense up, goddamn it!” Imagine saying that to Stossi, when he’s playing the bears? There’s a difference between intensity and tenseness. There’s a difference. But that’s unique to me. A lot of them – when I direct, I went back to tell the folks. I don’t do tests. He was like a mentor, without even talking to him. I saw actors who weren’t as good as they were in his movies, because he got them to be very natural. So I try and do that – to try and let them, like a horse, to give them some sort of freedom.

Speaking of horses, tell us about Wild Horses.

RD: It’s something I inherited. A guy from around here had written a screenplay that was not very good. There was something about it, I liked it. Because of the part of a lady Texas ranger. There were actually only three in Texas in real life. It was very chauvinistic. They have women rangers now. And I wanted her to play a woman ranger, even though she had played one in ‘Tanglewood’. That’s when she took up jiu jitsu and law enforcement and everything. Studying to play the part. I took a look at the movie, and I kept that on my ranch – I have a ranch in the movie. It’s a Western, but not just a Western. It’s a family thing. Fifteen years ago, it was different. I kicked my son off the ranch because he was gay. Which, you know, things were different then. Now, years later, he comes back to the family, to read the will and set things right, and there’s been a disappearing person. The day he left, his young lover disappeared. It’s almost like there’s been a crime, but no one can prove anything. So when he comes back, for the second time, the woman who lost her son, who disappeared, I got Luciana Padraza, do you know that actress, was in ‘Babel’? The woman who lost the baby in the desert? She has her own theater company in Florida. I went and found her and put her in the movie. She plays a woman whose  husband dies, and he says, “When I’m dying, I want you to re-open the case, and find out what happened to our son who disappeared.” And with the Texas rangers, with a closed case, a cold case is never really cold. It’s always open. So she goes to her, because she’s a woman ranger, to re-open the case, to find him, and she said she would help. That’s when we find out what happened, what I might have done to make that young boy disappear. And it’s kind of like uncovering that, but without being heavy-handed. That’s what it’s about mainly, and the family.

So you said you thought the script itself wasn’t very good, but there were compelling elements?

RD: It was terrible. You don’t have to say not good.

It was terrible?

RD: It just didn’t work. She was going to start a fire in it. It just didn’t work. I wanted to keep the lady ranger. I just wanted to make it. We worked on it, and worked on it, and worked on it. I had Billy Bob Thornton read it, and give me his opinion. To get it okay. We raised some money, and had a lot of problems – the money, who’s in charge, we only had twenty-three days to film it. With the Judge, we had sixty days. We only had twenty. We just had to jump in and do it. We did it in Utah, for Texas, because it was cheaper. But Skull Valley, Utah looks just like West Texas. At one point we used real Texas Rangers, because they’re great natural actors, because the undercover work they do anyway. So we did this scene on the Rio Grande and he texts some real Rangers in Rio Grande City, Texas, this ranger in Utah texted them, and said, “What part of Texas is this?” I said, “Rio Grande City,” he said, “No, Utah.” So we found parts of Utah that sufficed. It was kind of a family drama, a family thing, a little bit of a crime. Once again, offhand. When you look up the word tale in the dictionary, tale can mean a lot. A tale can mean a lie, but a tale also means a story, a small story of fiction. So that’s where I took a quote from the Bible, “A tale that is told.” That’s what I said for the movie: “A tale that is told.”

Was the gay character already in the original script?

RD: Yes.

And you kept it?

RD: I kept that.

Because it’s a very current subject, I guess. People have been more open to it. You said he kicks him out because he’s gay.

RD: That was part of the original script. I had to give him something. He was a nice young man. We kept that in there. We got Franco, he does all these movies about gay guys. He can take a paragraph like this, and learn it in ten seconds. So that’s why I think he can direct four movies in one year. Because of his memory. And then we got Josh Hartnett to be in it. We got Pedraza. We got Angie Cepeda from Columbia. So we had a very good cast.

How was your collaboration with James Franco?

RD: It was okay. He’s a handful! He’s a legitimate handful. I worked with him years ago, and he seemed different then. He could ride horses better than anyone in Hollywood. He’s a very talented guy.

How do you get Josh Hartnett out from not doing films, and just doing television shows to do this? I haven’t seen him in anything for years.

RD: I wanted to get him because he’s serious. So we had him smile, we had improvisation, we got him out and laughing and he had different colors. So we just kind of called him up.

So you just sent him the script?

RD: Yeah. And he said okay. I’m coming in tomorrow! He’s a talkative guy. But Franco more! I’ve known Franco for years now. So I went to see him in a Broadway play, and I liked him, and I gave him the script. I hadn’t seen him in a long time. I was like, “Oh, come on! New York!” He looked at me like I was a frickin’ doorman. Hundreds of people waiting outside of the theater for Franco. He’s got twelve-million people on his Twitter list, or whatever you call that. The only guy with more is Downey.

Do people still recognize you on the street?

RD: Me? Especially in Texas. From ‘Lonesome Dove’. But Franco, that’s another thing, and Downey.

 

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SXSW Review: THE DIABOLICAL

F56347.jpg

The Diabolical is the first – and oddly enough only – horror movie I’ve seen at SXSW that actually tries to be scary. More often than not at this year’s fest, we saw midnighters going for a creepy but never quite scary vibe (The Boy, The Frontier), attempting to be satirical (Ava’s Possessions, Excess Flesh) or just being batty, campy gorefests (Deathgasm, He Never Died, Turbo Kid). Though there are some potentially frightening aspects at play in The Diabolical, it fails to employ its scares effectively – opting for jump scares that rarely work out and a late stage science fiction twist that doesn’t come together either. The result is the most standardized and, by extension, the most boring midnighter of the fest, though definitely not the worst.

Ali Larter plays Madison, a single mother filing for bankruptcy and living under a possessed roof. As needy real estate goons (Patrick Fischler) haunt her with offers on her soon-to-be-foreclosed house, the real danger lies in three gooey spirits – all that look like Uruk Hai freshly born from their swampy wombs – who appear and disappear with the flash of a light. What are these spirits after, you may ask? Having seen the movie, I’m still not really sure. And herein lies the biggest problem of The Diabolical. After all is said and done, I’m still unsure of the point, the plot and some other factors to boot.

The Diabolical‘s most diabolical move was to make me sleepy (note however that I saw it in the middle of the day not after the midnight mark). And though my eyes may have fluttered through a detail of paramount importance, the questions the movie raises still feel squarely unanswerered. Consider, if one misses but a small detail and it rocks the rest of the film, what does that say about the movie itself?

Though admirable for its deliciously grotesque practical creature design, there’s no real compelling thread to keep you engaged beyond an exhaustingly clichéd tendency to try and “get ya” with jump scare moments. “It’s scary because you didn’t expect to see a monster there!” Gettit?

There’s a sweetly sad subplot between Madison’s tween-age son Jacob (Max Rose) and daughter Hayley (Chloe Perrin), the former of which has been seeing a guidance counselor after beating a classmate senseless and the later of which speaks to these haunting figures against the wishes of her mother and brother. You get a nice sense that these two – and momma – are all each other have, especially after the circumstances surrounding their dad’s disappearance.

At camp, a real Draco Malfoy of a bully (Thomas Kuc) picks on Hayley and Jacob whomps him real nice. Really serves him up a nice knuckle sandwich. The ol’ nose-splitting pie. Back at home, his mom pleads, “You can’t just going around hitting people,” though Jacob feels justified. After all, he was just defending his little sister!

Moves like this help to put the pieces in place for the final reveal but with director Alistair Legrand does lift the curtain, he attempts to shape shift the material to mixed results. Planting a bait-and-switch like this so late in the game, the mechanics of his world became even more lost on me and failed to properly piece together a reasonable timeline for the events of the film. Ambitious, no doubt, but ultimately fails to distinguish itself from the field.

C-

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SXSW Review: THE BOY

F56337.jpg
Ted (Jared Breeze) is a serial killer in the making. He’s only nine years old but all the warning signs are there in Craig William Macneill’s slow burning but explosively rewarding The Boy. Like the great unmade redneck prequel to The Good Son, The Boy shows the quiet transformation of ennui to psychosis as an immeasurably bored towhead graduates from coaxing animals to their death to killing them outright before finally setting his sights on his own genus and gene pool.

At first, Ted’s to-be murderous ways are red flag worthy but aren’t necessarily of the abandon all hope variety. You see, his hollow-eyed father John (David Morse) rewards Ted with a shiny quarter each time he scraps up a new piece of roadkill. I guess a dilapidated highway motel only stands to gain from less roadkill polluting their doorstep but it’s a grim job for any father to assign a son and is representative of the hands-off approach John has adopted towards his boy. In his notebook, Ted records each and every find – a  “sqirl” on 5/14, maybe a “rebet” on 5/22 – and is nickel and diming his way towards a one-way Greyhound ticket to Florida, where his mother had run off to with a trucker years back.

Discouraged by a relative lack of progress, Ted glances at his pet rabbit and then out at the highway. Don’t do it, we plead and, thankfully, he doesn’t. But that doesn’t mean his thirst for mullah and, more distressingly, blood is satiated. By dumping trash and millet in the sparsely traveled highway outside his family’s all-but-abandoned motel, Ted realizes that he can spring a fairly effective and super duper redneck trap for the unsuspecting woodland creatures.

When Ted notes a deer ambling around his property, he dashes to the feedback and piles grain high in the road. As the sun is blotted out by an inky mass of night, a thunderous crash echoes across the motel. Ted dashes out to find William (Rainn Wilson), his car crumpled and scrapped, and his animal target, eviscerated in the road.

As Ted continues to up the ante of what he is willing to do – a family staying at the lodge by necessity almost finds out the hard way that Ted doesn’t play well with other children – we get a taste of true madness, regardless of the seemingly innocent vessel that is Ted Henley.  Macniell plays with the idea of how sociopathic/psychopathic tendencies are incubated and exacerbated with his script (co-written by novelist Clay McLeod Chapman) providing feasible insight into how emotional neglect and wholesale boredom can drive people to some pretty terrifying lengths.

Sparsely dominated by scenes of heavy exposition – or rather any dialogue at all – Macniell is able to catch the quiet moments; the death stares, the purposeless shambling, the looks of silence. Clean, lumbering sound design operates to keep us invested in The Boy‘s emotionscape and its overarching feeling of dread. When it all comes full circle and Ted readies himself to emerge from his dark chrysalis, affairs take a middle ground stance between Hesher and Carrie and we are witness to a gorgeously haunting transformation of soul.

B

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SXSW REVIEW: CREATIVE CONTROL

Creative Control takes place in a world of technology just a few year’s out from today. Cell phones and computer screens are composed of sheer cuts of opaque glass and flicker with images only visible to their owner. Apps are controlled with the slightest wave of a finger, like a symphony composer directing his orchestra. Wearable tech has reached a fever pitch and though the big names like Apple, Google and Microsoft have name brand recognition working in their favor, a new product called Augmenta is the definitive future of how humans will interact with their technology. Read More