post

Red Band Trailer for V/H/S 2

Last year’s V/H/S was a delightfully spooky affair. Working within the same found footage compilation framework, V/H/S 2 offers up seven different visions from emerging filmmakers Simon Barrett, Adam Wingard, Edúardo Sanchez, Gregg Hale, Timo Tjahjanto, Gareth Huw Evans and Jason Eisener. I’ll be seeing the premiere next week so I’m gonna pass on the trailer though I’d encourage any horror fans to take a peek and see if this is up their alley.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmUfP3Dupbo

V/H/S/2 will be on iTunes/On Demand June 6 and in theaters July 12.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

James Franco Did a Faulker Adaptation Of AS I LAY DYING. This is the Trailer.

http://www.themovies.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/As-I-Lay-Dying.jpg
James Franco
is something of an enigma. On one side of the coin, he’s definitely an intelligent. He’s taught courses at NYU, USC and UCLA where he is also an adjunct professor of English and is pursuing a PhD at Yale. He is a prominent actor and a celebrated multimedia artist. He was nominated for a Best Actor Oscar at the Academy Awards for his performance in Danny Boyle‘s 127 Hours. And yet somehow, anytime the guy gives an interview, or even more notable when he hosted the Academy Awards, he kind of seems like a stoned goof.

This year, Franco has tried his hand at yet another project: adapting William Faulkner‘s As I Lay Dying. Considering the literary prowess of the source material, its status as a Cannes Selected Feature and this promising trailer, the result may just be quiet good. I typically have a hard time being won over by films about the early 20th century as they seem to rotate around accuracy rather than a hard pressing story so we’ll see where this one lands for me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO68Kd2yQsE

As I Lay Dying is directed by James Franco and stars Franco, Jim Parrack, Tim Blake Nelson, Richard Jenkins, Danny McBride, Logan Marshall-Green,and Ahna O’Reilly. It is set to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival on May 20.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

SIFF Review: FRANCES HA

“Frances Ha”
Directed by Noah Baumbach
Starring Greta Gerwig, Mickey Sumner, Adam Driver, Michael Zegen and Patrick Heusinger
Comedy
86 Mins

Noah Baumbach is at his least caustic with Frances Ha, an idiosyncratic and delightful black-and-white mumblecore film about a New York City girl coming to terms with herself in the haze of her post-collegiate days. Newcomer Greta Gerwig offers up a performance in the vein of Dustin Hoffman’s Benjamin from The Graduate as she mumbles and bumbles her way through the purgatory of her mid-twenties. To continue the comparison with The Graduate, Frances Ha is an equally quirky, if less lovable, film that thrives on silly banter and whimsy spirit.

Frances and Sophie (Mickey Sumner) are best friends. They do everything together. They eat together, smoke together, they even sleep (platonically) together — so long as Frances takes her socks off. But as Frances breaks off her relationship right when Sophie starts a new one, their lives head on different trajectories and their seemingly unbreakable friendship starts to show cracks.

 

Without Sophie in her life, Frances focuses on her middling career as a dancer but ends up spiraling downward, a fact that is illustrated by her progressively less-impressive living situations as she moves from small apartment to smaller apartment to cramped dorm room. As she ostensibly devolves backwards, she reaches her own little whit’s end and resorts to packing in tidbits of a life she feels she should have.

As she begins to live out these snippets of a fantasy life, there is a nagging sense of Frances fighting to feel relevant and keep up the fantasy of herself that she has woven. She sees a rich life, full of fun and meaningful work in store but can’t quite seem to hop off the lilly pad. This feeling is one that most of our generation can sympathize with. A feeling of obligation to accomplish X and Y and see A and B before you transform into the insignificant party guest without a story. A pre-30 quasi-bucket list that hangs above our heads.

 

Luckily, the dour notes are kept to a minimum even when the film is exploring the more difficult sides in realizing, and overcoming, the random and trivial nature of self-progress. No matter how down on her luck, Frances refuses to abandon her goofy smile and veneer of perfect success and satisfaction and that happy-go-lucky attitude is what keeps the film so cheery. The sense of levity may come from Frances’ dancing but it lingers on in her spirit.

Even though Baumbach has clearly had a vast contribution to the film, Gewrig is sure to gain some praise for her double-headed role as star and writer as this is very clearly her show. Frances Ha appears to be more her vision than Baumbach’s, who has a much more acrid and seasoned voice. The film clearly comes from the perspective of a young woman struggling to be someone in this stunted US economy.

 

However much of a captain Gerwig may be, her and Baumbach seem like the perfect marriage of talent as Gerwig’s cheery attitude keeps Baumbach’s sour edge from spoiling the fun. Meanwhile Baumbach injects a mature and sensitive directorial hand that gives the film a learned crispness and tautness that an amateur like Gerwig would most likely not be able to achieve by herself. Neither get the better of each other and the combination allows Frances Ha to transcend a story about the 2010’s, 2000’s or the 1990’s, as this is a film for all generations.

The topic at hand seems to be a popular one of late: a recently graduated twentysomething chick,  struggling to pay monthly rent and find her place in the world.Gerwig’s Frances is a much more palatable presence than Lena Dunham‘s entitled persona on Girls. Her vision of modern-girl-lost tackles the zeitgeist of generation-unnamed without any of the preachy faux-wisdom that dominates that popular show. Even though I would hardly call this a film intended for girls, any twentysomething chick with a taste for Dunham’s particular flavor will be sure to eat this one up.

 

The comedy is easy and the drama meaningful in Baumbach and Gerwig’s Frances Ha, making it a perfect storm of societal commentary that doesn’t wield its satire like a knife’s edge but rather picks and jabs in a playful manner.It’s gleeful revelry in quirk and fancy-free nature make the film a delightful little retreat from the troubles which haunt and pester us in our own lives. Frances Ha is filled with a bubbly sense of life and an effervescent lead character that smooths out some of the more melancholic moments and makes the whole thing go down as easy as a Sunday mimosa.

A-

post

Weekly Review 25: RUST AND BONE, JOHN DIES AT THE END, SEARCHING FOR SUGARMAN


In theaters this week, I caught The Great Gatsby as well as a number of films over at the Seattle International Film Festival. While I already wrote up reviews for What Maisie Knew, which is arguably the best movie of the year so far, and Mistaken for Strangers, the quasi-documentary on The National, I also caught Frances Ha and We Steal Secrets: The Story of Wikileaks although they are still embargoed so you’ll have to wait a little longer for reviews on those ones. Other than those, here’s a trio from 2012 that have been lingering on my to-watch list.

Rust and Bone (2012)

 

Rust and Bone is a difficult film that’s something of an emotional endurance test. While the themes and approach couldn’t be more European, there’s universality to the complexity of people on screen here and both Marion Cotillard and Matthias Schoenaerts give stirring performances.

Director Jacques Audiard deals exclusively in shades of grey and even when the audience is led to be down on someone, Audiard never abandons them to the wolves and pulls them by the bootstraps out of their own emotional mires. Without revealing any of the critical plot points, Rust and Bone deals not only with loss but with recovery proposing that maybe it’s not the fall that matters but how we choose to pick ourselves up afterwards.

A-

 

John Dies at the End (2012)

Is ita spoiler if I tell you that John doesn’t die at the end? He dies pretty early on…but not really because he comes back to life…or maybe he didn’t die at all. It’s all very confusing, as is the entirety of this mindfuck of a film. Between talking on bratwurst cellphone, fighting meat demons and a driving dog, John Dies at the End is all about independence from the norm and breaking out of traditional elements of narrative…and time…and space. The gooey puppet-driven effects are amiably reminiscent of 80’s David Cronenberg and as a huge Cronenberg fan, you can definitely say it worked for me.

As as absurdist low-budg genre-bender in spirit and execution, John Dies at the End is also crassly comic, endlessly strange and downright fun. Like when you try to make a milkshake and forget to put the lid on, stuff goes just about everywhere and results in one hell of a mess but, hey, it’s still kinda tasty. This is the final product that is JDatE. In time, this daring original film could be something of an underground favorite as it has all the makings of a cult film but cult classic or not, it’s still super weird.

 

C+

Searching for Sugarman (2012)

 

In the process of discovering Sixto Rodriquez, who here is given the moniker of Sugarman, a fascinating tale of ill-conceived serendipity in the era of rock rebellion emerges. As an artist, Rodriguez is a mystery, never afforded any semblance of fandom or commercial popularity in the US even though his records were a surging anti-establishment force for the whole of South Africa. Somehow though, Rodriguez never heard tell of his international fame nor did he see one penny of the profit. Thus begins the story of a man who seems to have disappeared off the face of the planet.

Filmmaker Malik Bendjelloul does an acceptable job of tracking the history of Rodriguez, both in historical terms and accompanying rumors, but when it comes to the hard-hitting questions, he’s happy playing softball. He leaves the corporate corruption and music industry undercuts alone and instead focuses solely on this man of mystery. But when all is said and done, the film presents a fascinating man’s mind-blowing experience of rock’n’roll over four decades and the true story is interesting enough to make the film more than worthwhile. What sticks with you most of all though is Rodriguez’s fantastic songs off of his album ‘Cold Fact’ that are amiably peppered throughout.

B+

 

post

You're Gonna Get Hop-Ons With First Trailer for ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT Season 4

http://flavorwire.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/ads4.jpg
As if the stream of posters wasn’t enough, we can finally watch the Bluths back in action as the first trailer for the ten-years-in-the-making fourth season of Arrested Development has hit the web. Featuring Michael, George Michael, Maebe, Lindsay, Tobias, George Sr, Gob, Buster and Lucille as well as a slew of supporting bit characters, this trailer offers a bounty of references to the first three seasons, giving off the impression that they will continue the tradition of long running jokes. Let’s hope that show-runner Mitchell Hurwitz didn’t prematurely shoot his wad on a dry run so Netflix doesn’t have something of a mess on their hands.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfU2Td_MMf0

Arrested Development stars Jason Bateman, Jeffrey Tambor, Portia De Rossi, Michael Cera, Will Arnett, Tony Hale, Alia Shawkat, Jessica Walter and David Cross and will air exclusively on Netflix with all 15 episodes on Sunday, May 26.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Out in Theaters: TURBO

“Turbo”
Directed by David Soren
Starring Ryan Reynolds, Paul Giamatti, Michael Peña, Luis Guzmán, Bill Hader, Maya Rudolph, Richard Jenkins, Ken Jeong, Michelle Rodriquez, Snoop Dogg, Samuel L. Jackson
Animation, Family
96 Mins
PG

Turbo may be vanilla, formulaic animation but it’s an underdog story with undeniable heart – afforded buckets of charm by its talented voice cast. With more and more animated features leaning on quickly fading cultural references, risqué winks aimed at parents, and goofball low blows, Turbo is happy as a clam (er snail) to just be an earnest family movie with a heart of gold. It isn’t formula-changing nor is it distinctly original – and it is certainly easy to foresee the end of the racetrack from miles ahead – but it’s a film that’s almost impossible to dislike and will most likely charm your pants off.   

As a Ryan Reynolds skeptic, early doubts are cast with him in the position of voicing Theo – the lead snail (later re-named Turbo). Reassuringly though, Reynolds has checked his snarky pomp at the door, taking up a tone far more sincere than what we’ve come to expect. This is the Reynolds we met in the fantastic Buried, not the Green Lantern blockhead.

Instead of zinging jokes off left and right, Reynolds voices Turbo with restrained honesty. Turbo’s wide-eyed view of the world is childlike; his goals, ambitions and Reynolds’s take manages to nail the awing bent of his little snail counterpart. Like many animated characters before him, he’s a dreamer – a character caught in a limited community with no escape and sky high aspirations. He’s in need of a talent that just doesn’t come naturally to him.

In Turbo’s case, he’s a snail and he wants to go fast. When he’s not watching for tomatoes to fall from the branches of his humble little garden he and his snail troupe occupy, Turbo watches Formula One racing on television, idolizing international French super-racer Guy Gagné (Bill Hader). Like Ratatouille‘s Gusteau, Gagné (French for “wins”) props up a similar idea that no dream is too big and no dreamer too small. But unlike Gusteau, Gagné’s act may be just that.

Back in the garden, Turbo’s daily grind is pretty dull. Aside from lawn mower threats and the occasional crow nabbing up one of the community members for a tasty treat, life is slow moving, or dare I say, sluggish. Like the great outcasts and dreamers of the past, no one quite understands Turbo and take to openly mocking his speedy ambitions. Turbo’s toughest critic is also his only surviving family member – his cautious brother, Chet (Paul Giamatti).

When Turbo’s excessive self-confidence puts the community at risk, him and his brother are exiled and Turbo goes for a head-hanging, slime-trailed crawl to the highway overpass. At this point, adults in the audience are much more aware of the suicidal undertones – with the somber mood similarly informing that interpretation – but this is a kids movie…right?! Whether or not this little garden snail was about to off himself or not, something magical happens as Turbo gets knocked from the bridge and sucked into a drag-racing car’s engine at the exact moment that it’s being flooded with NOS. For those readers who have yet to see the Fast and Furious franchise – NOS is short for Nitrous Oxide, a chemical accelerant that can be installed in your car for an instant boost of several hundred horsepower. Naturally, the NOS attaches to Turbo’s DNA gene sequencing in much the same way that Peter Parker became Spiderman and just like that, Turbo isn’t slow anymore. In fact, he can rip up past speeds of 200 mph.

However absurd the premise is, it’s endearingly executed so when Turbo does gear up his powers, you’re cheering for him rather than guffawing the flapdoodle logic. Alongside his super speed, Turbo is also equipped with other car-like gadgetry like reverse beeping when he’s moving backwards, high beams and a ghetto-blaster – none of which really come into play other than as quick gags to gather up the kiddie laughs.

 

With his newly acquired skills, Turbo, with brother Chet in tow, unexpectedly join the ranks of a snail racing crew. It’s here that the film flaunts it’s Fast and Furious-esque aspects as each snail character has their own little personality quirks and the cast, like that franchise, is noticeably multiracial. The crew is led by Samuel L. Jackson voicing Whiplash, the cocky but amiable leader of the snail trail dashers. I don’t need to tell you that Turbo is faster than the other snails so when frightfully obese but fatally loveable Tito (Michael Peña) sees just how speedy little Turbo is, his own dreams of grandeur propel him to enter Turbo in the Indie 500.


Just writing up these little plot details make the whole project seem like a menial exercise in disposable family-friendly material churning but you have to take the overwhelming genial nature of the project into mind. Like all animated film, you have to accept a degree of suspended disbelief. Whether it comes in the form of a sentient robot, talking toys, or a cooking rat, these characters are likeable and memorable not because of their dummy descriptions but because of their overwhelming heart, the amount of perky escapism they allow and the moral lessons they impart.

While it doesn’t quite possess the unmitigated originality of Pixar‘s golden age, it does carry a similar heart-on-its-sleeve air to it that is immensely breathable. Rather than capriciously turning on itself and trying to be something greater than it is, Turbo maintains a benevolent sweetness that wins over our smiles and goodwill. There isn’t a bad bone in Turbo‘s body and even though the result is somewhat akin to easy listening, it’s easy listening that you don’t mind slowly nodding along to.

B-

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Trailer for Alfonso Cuaron's GRAVITY

http://cdn.bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/gravity-alfonso-cuaron1.jpg
At the turn of the year, I called Alfonso Cuaron‘s Gravity my most anticipated film of the year. Now while I wasn’t trying to hype it up, there was something alluring in the mystique of the film and I had great faith in Cuaron’s (Children of Men, Y Tu Mama Tambien) weathered directorial hand.

Initially slated for a release date last year, the post production on this somewhat effects-driven film ended up keeping it in the stables for much longer than expected. Meanwhile, the world waited to see whether Cuaron would be able to deliver the epic we expect from him.

Anticipation is a funny thing. Sometimes the mere act of expectation can warp our reaction to the final product so I’m trying to remain as skeptical as possible. That’s why I won’t be watching this trailer even though I really, really want to.

You, on the other hand, ought to dig in and enjoy watching George Clooney and Sandra Bullock play around as endangered astronauts. Tell me how you think this one looks in the comments section.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufsrgE0BYf0

Gravity is directed by Alfonso Cuaron and stars Sandra Bullock and George Clooney. It will fall into theaters on October 4.

Follow Silver Screen Riot on Facebook
Follow Silver Screen Riot on Twitter

post

Out in Theaters: THE GREAT GATSBY

“The Great Gatsby”
Directed by Baz Luhrmann
Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey MacGuire, Carey Mulligan, Joel Edgerton, Elizabeth Debicki
Drama, Romance
143 Mins
PG-13

Cut through the glitzy spectacle of Baz Luhrmann’s ambitious adaptation of The Great Gatsby and you’ll find the same enthusiastic spirit that defined Fitzgerald’s timeless opus about tragic love amidst the underbelly of American opulence. Rather than stripping the story down, Luhrmann indulges the more caricaturesque elements of Fitzersgerald’s tale, painting an almost unimaginable sketch of wealth during the roaring ’20s. But in trying to replicate the tone-poem of the prosaic novel, Luhrmann goes with some unfortunate filmmaking tactics, such as back-reaching recollection via plagiarized voice-overs, which rob the film of its full emotional and visceral impact. On a visual level, The Great Gatsby is beyond perfect but its lingering emotional stasis and hackneyed, choppy editing limit it from reaching the greatness it promises.

Like the great novel, The Great Gatsby follows the perspective of Nick Carraway, an aspiring novelist who has abandoned his dream to chase illusions of riches in the bonds business. When Nick moves into a humble abode on West Egg, sandwiched between castles of old and new wealth, he discovers that his mysterious neighbor, Gatsby, is a man of many rumors. After being formally invited to one of Gatsby’s famous parties, Nick strikes up a chance friendship with Gatsby as his true motivations come to light.

Although Luhrmann’s film sticks closely to the book, it breaks away in the opening moments as we meet soft-spoken protagonist Nick in the throes of an up-class psychiatry institute. Recalling the circumstances that led to his disillusionment with the city of New York and his history with his friend, the illusive Gatsby, Nick’s story is seen as a therapy of sorts – an unloading of demons and a second-look at a time littered with boozing and schmoozing. As Nick writes, we fall into his tale of the magical and notorious Gatsby.

Rather than axing the first person recollection of the novel, The Great Gatsby adopts it, at once revealing its soft belly and opening it up for easy criticism. As a golden rule, recollection is a storytelling crutch and even though Fitzergerald’s novel used that method, film is held to a different standard. Unfortunately, Luhrmann carries the shoddy first act on the shoulders of voice-over and recollection and it’s not until the 30-minute mark when we actually met Gatsby that the voice-over fades away and the disparate pacing changes to a more manageable and enjoyable cadence.

Moving outside of his faltering editing tactics and onto the visual spectrum, Gatsby is a thing of awe. Luhrmann paints on thick coats of grandeur and offers up true aesthetic decadence, realizing the spectacular vision of Fitzgerald’s novel with exemplary panache. Like a child playing with ants, Luhrmann peels back the castle-tops and mansion walls, exposing the hive of manufactured social circles pettily scurrying around. He has captured the dreamlike quality to Fitzergerald’s work, particularly during the lavish party scenes. The music is lively and explosive and his choice to approach the soundtrack with a more modern flair works for the most part. These are the parties of our dreams and it’s no wonder that they and Gatsby cast a spell on the whole of New York.

But beneath all of the glamorous appearances, the caked-up faces, the flapper dresses and penguin tuxedos, Gatsby’s guests are petty people glomming onto unattainable rumors and silly assumptions of their host. Amidst tales of espionage, murder and thievery, Gatsby has a mythology all of his own and this mystique only seems to ignite the townsfolk’s attraction. Slashing through the cascades of sparkling streamers, beneath the fireworks and beyond the reach of the blaring jazz, we discover Gatsby is a quiet entertainer, carefully biding his time and allowing these many rumors to wash over him. The execution of Gatsby’s big reveal, when he and Nick first meet, is a visceral gut-punch, exhibiting the fact that Luhrman can be a cunning and tasteful director when he puts his mind to it.

For the most part though, the aesthetics take precendence over the story, which often feels piecemealed together. Events are pasted together, lacking the natural flow of time and circumstance that defines more fluid efforts. Time in the film jolts unmarked from one event to another without much explanation and this rocky sense of a time frame yanks us out of the moment, back into our theater chairs. Without an organic sense of inertia, the story feels inconsequential and loses any sense of realism that it fleetingly grasps.

But behind the lavish set designs, shimmering costuming and Luhrmann’s many crane-cam flourishes, the performers can be seen taking their roles seriously, digging into them as much as the material allows and each player acting out this ill-fated romance fits the bill of their respective, iconic roles perfectly.

Gatsby is an iconoclast set on fulfilling the grandiose illusions he has dreamed for himself and Leonardo DiCaprio fills those heavy shoes with careful trepidation. This is a man submerged within himself, who rides the spectrum of emotion and only an actor with such broad range as DiCaprio could bear that hefty burden. The man behind the curtain of Gatsby is caught in the trappings of hubris, set with the false assumption that wealth can overcome all odds. In his belief, he is a man both empowered and terrified, bold yet bumbling. In his depiction of the great Gatsby, Leo lives up to his namesake and delivers another great performance.

While Tobey MacGuire aptlytakes the reins of the squeamish, easily agitated Nick Carraway (and his off-camera chemisty with DiCaprio works to their character’s relationship on-camera), he is more of a supporting character even though he’s our guide narrating us through the story. He’s happy to be a bystander and play lapdog to the grandeur of Gatsby so he’s somewhat easy to overlook in the long haul.

At the center of the equation is Daisy who is an inherently difficult character to play, as she essentially is a smart, witty girl playing the role of the dullard. Some of the first words out of her mouth are –“the best thing a girl can be in this world is a beautiful little fool.” From here, her character is born. Afraid of breaking out of the role that society has placed her in, Daisy refrains from exposing her true self and falls back on parroting the bold men she surrounds herself with. Carey Mulligan captures the hopeful emptiness of Daisy in her portrayal but in doing so it’s hard to draw the line of disengagement considering that trait is built into the fundaments of her character. Where she’s faking it or her character is at times unclear but in the time of false people and pseudo-love, isn’t that the point?

Rounding out the ménage-à-trois of doomis Tom Buchannan, the hard-handed ruffian raised on old money and whitewashed with Americano ornaments. Joel Edgerton‘s gruff face and wary eyes fit Buchanan like a tailored suit and he is able to be a truly detestable scourge without flying off the handle or leaping over-the-top. He’s the odd man out in this love triangle and a sore loser at that but Edgerton manages cool restraint even when driven over the edge and this calculated performance adds life to an otherwise one-dimensional bully.

As such a classic piece of work, audiences go into The Great Gatsby with a sense of ownership. Whether that will paint your existence one way or the other really depends on the level of flexibility you’re willing to engage in with Luhrmann’s work. While it closely encapsulates the inimitable essence of the loosely moralized jazz age, it does so in such a way that is sure to scrub your own imaginary palette clean for its duration.

Whereas the novel was a piece of work worthy of being slowly digested, cherishing each beautifully piercing line of prose, this adaptation fails to cast the same enchanting spell. While it’s a worthy adaptation of one of the greatest works of American literature, it feels, at times, flat and uninspired. A mere coughing up of something great; pre-digested, regurgitated and spray-painted with gold. 

Baz Luhrmann has an alleged fascination with tragic romance and The Great Gatsby is no exception. From a purely aesthetic point of view, his film is dazzling – capturing the spectacular life of something assumed unfilmable. The performers are all on pitch and manage to breathe life into these characters to help weave the caricature of a time on the brink of moral and financial collapse. Regrettably, the film overextends its boundaries, aided by poor adaptation prowess, and disappoints on its pledge of greatness. The true tragedy is that the film settles for being pretty good.